A Circuit Voice

Submission by Nigel Pascoe QC, former Leader of the Western Circuit.

1. I have been in full time practice at the bar for 47 years and a silk for 25 years.

2. The proposed cuts in legal aid rates have to be seen in the context of an austere financial commitment to reduce the deficit. Sacrifices must be made by every section of the community. That is the realistic starting point.

3. The percentage cut in fees across the board is unprecedented in all forms of publicly paid work.

4. By way of illustration, my own approximate estimate is that the average level of income for Queen’s Counsel in future doing legal aid crime is unlikely to exceed half the average earned by an NHS consultant doing only National Health work.

5. Similarly junior counsel will be lucky to earn half the amount of general practitioners also doing only NHS work. Each figure takes account of average chambers expenses.

6. There is room for some debate on that generalisation in both directions, but it can stand as a useful comparator for these purposes.

7. Neither consequence is fair.

8. It follows that there will be an immediate diminution in the number of criminal practitioners. Insofar as that will be said then to reflect an oversupply of criminal barristers, it will also be represented as a market reaction which is not the business of government. That ignores the loss of considerable expertise throughout the profession.

9. The further problem is the message it sends to young would be criminal barristers. Put simply, they will not do crime in any significant numbers.

10. This in the medium term will be strongly against the public interest. Unless there is a reasonable supply of young barristers learning their craft, standards must drop and cases conducted at a lower level of competancy.

11. Ultimately an inadequate work force means a loss of quality, in the predictable future. The worst consequence will be that the guilty escape and some innocent people will be convicted. Further poor advocacy inevitably will produce more appeals.

12. The revised scheme does not address necessary work done out of court. Specifically I refer to necessary advices and evening preparatory work. Further it does not address travel costs which may even mean that an advocate may lose money by accepting a brief. That is indefensible.

12a In my view, there has been insufficient consideration given to alternative proposals made by the Bar Council to save money.


Both sides should submit to independent arbitration by a panel which includes a very senior retired Judge.

Nigel Pascoe QC


One thought on “A Circuit Voice

  1. We submitted ourselves to arbitration – it was called the Carter Review. An independent and balanced scheme for fees was suggested and, after a delay, adopted by the Government. It was done in good faith on the part of the Bar. That good faith has been repeatedly abused by heaping more (unpaid) work onto us, cutting the fees which were agreed to be fair, and failing to make any increase for inflation over the years.

    We have all seen the impact this has had upon the criminal bar over the last ten years. God people have left due to financial pressures, very few are entering the profession at the lower levels.

    None of us want to take action. At heart, we are all professionals who take pride in the work we do (prosecuting and defending) and who greatly value the quality of our criminal justice system – part of which is down to the independent bar. But we have been driven into a postion where, in my view, there is little option left to us. The proposed further cuts will destroy the independent criminal bar, erode the quality of the criminal justice system (and in years to come the Judiciary), and lead to miscarriages of justice.

    We can no longer stand by. Enough is enough. Unless we do something now, we may as well pack our wig tins and leave the profession forever.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s